Osage vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,705,575 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 123.5 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,615, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $81,064, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,568 compared to $39,194, a difference of 0.95%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $50,772, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $43,844, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.75%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.43%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.23%), bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and associate's degree (41.5% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.79%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.6%).