Osage vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,623,030 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.728% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 727.8 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,691, a difference of 10.8%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $61,000, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,240 compared to $75,574, a difference of 0.44%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $87,864, a difference of 0.60%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $35,477, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.1%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 81.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 0.59%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.2%).