Osage vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,469,284 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 33.7 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $55,714, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $91,541, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $106,109, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 9.1%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $55,241, a difference of 9.8%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $43,539, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 37.5%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.060%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.9%), family households (63.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.90%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 64.9%), bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.74%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.3%).