Osage vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,174,134 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.896. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.588% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 588.3 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $33,921, a difference of 16.7%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $82,386, a difference of 11.6%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $46,417, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $35,063, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $52,509, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 63.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 59.8%), and male poverty (12.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 16.8%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 75.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 71.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.5%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.60%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.7%), bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.5%), disability (14.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and female disability (14.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.41%).