Osage vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,181,694 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 28.8 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $102,261, a difference of 15.7%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $85,797, a difference of 14.0%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $44,987, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $39,109, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $46,916, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.2%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.23%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.4%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%).