Osage vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
Latvians
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,034,344 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.786. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 75.1 Latvians.
Osage vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $52,649, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $115,957, a difference of 31.2%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $120,301, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $52,783, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $67,326, a difference of 20.9%).
Income Metric | Osage | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.9% |
Osage vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 39.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 38.8%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.6%).
Poverty Metric | Osage | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Osage vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Osage | Latvian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Osage vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Osage vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.4%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (47.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Osage | Latvian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Osage vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 6.1% |
Osage vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 68.8%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 57.7%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Education Level Metric | Osage | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Osage vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.6%).
Disability Metric | Osage | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |