Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Japan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Immigrants from Japan

Fair
Exceptional
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,483
SOCIAL INDEX
92.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
15th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Japan Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,860,932 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.400% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 399.6 Immigrants from Japan.
Osage Integration in Immigrants from Japan Communities

Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $53,359, a difference of 34.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $118,498, a difference of 34.1%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $100,711, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $55,932, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $69,774, a difference of 25.3%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Income
Income MetricOsageImmigrants from Japan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Exceptional
$53,359
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Exceptional
$122,764
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Exceptional
$100,711
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Exceptional
$54,938
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Exceptional
$65,518
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Exceptional
$45,323
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Exceptional
$55,932
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Exceptional
$112,228
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Exceptional
$118,498
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Exceptional
$69,774
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
27.9%

Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 45.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 42.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and poverty (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageImmigrants from Japan
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
13.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
13.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
18.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
9.0%

Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageImmigrants from Japan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageImmigrants from Japan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
34.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.7%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.020%), family households (63.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageImmigrants from Japan
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Poor
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
47.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Exceptional
26.4%

Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.4%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageImmigrants from Japan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Fair
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
6.3%

Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 72.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.8%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageImmigrants from Japan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Exceptional
46.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
2.8%

Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 69.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 51.9%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.2%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Japan Disability
Disability MetricOsageImmigrants from Japan
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%