Osage vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Guatemalans

Fair
Poor
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,190,136 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.462% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 461.7 Guatemalans.
Osage Integration in Guatemalan Communities

Osage vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,525, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $46,736, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $87,705, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $35,695, a difference of 0.95%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $75,961, a difference of 0.96%).
Osage vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricOsageGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
22.6%

Osage vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and single female poverty (24.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Osage vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageGuatemalan
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%

Osage vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.9%).
Osage vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageGuatemalan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Osage vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
Osage vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.2%

Osage vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.40, a difference of 7.1%).
Osage vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageGuatemalan
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Tragic
37.1%

Osage vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.7%).
Osage vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.0%

Osage vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 97.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and college, under 1 year (62.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Osage vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%

Osage vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.2%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Osage vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricOsageGuatemalan
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%