Osage vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,062,896 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 62.5 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,215, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $93,718, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $84,401, a difference of 0.070%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $51,216, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $46,982, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.1%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.9% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 11.4%), currently married (47.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.71%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 61.0%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.6%).