Osage vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,433,587 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 64.0 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $49,997, a difference of 9.2%), per capita income ($39,568 compared to $36,651, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $83,937, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $82,166, a difference of 2.8%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $48,899, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 31.7%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and poverty (13.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.7%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 112.2%), ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.3%).