Osage vs Nepalese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,125,314 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.077% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 77.0 Nepalese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $54,472, a difference of 19.0%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $82,410, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $49,458, a difference of 1.7%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $94,153, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $43,860, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 42.1%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.48%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.9%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (63.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 116.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.79%), college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 87.8%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.6%).