Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Immigrants from Ghana

Fair
Poor
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,747,552 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 133.9 Immigrants from Ghana.
Osage Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,333, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $39,894, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $51,836, a difference of 3.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $87,760, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $41,131, a difference of 4.0%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
Income MetricOsageImmigrants from Ghana
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Tragic
$41,131
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Tragic
$96,544
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Tragic
$81,489
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Fair
$45,641
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Tragic
$51,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Good
$39,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Poor
$51,333
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Tragic
$87,760
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Tragic
$94,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Tragic
$58,624
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
22.3%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.2%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.020%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty (14.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageImmigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageImmigrants from Ghana
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageImmigrants from Ghana
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Good
82.9%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.6%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.53%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageImmigrants from Ghana
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Tragic
42.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Tragic
34.5%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 90.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 9.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.6%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageImmigrants from Ghana
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
16.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
83.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Tragic
47.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
16.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.2%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.4%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.95%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageImmigrants from Ghana
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
89.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
87.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
63.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
57.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Poor
44.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.3%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.0%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
Disability MetricOsageImmigrants from Ghana
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.5%