Osage vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,012,666 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 18.8 Tsimshian.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $54,649, a difference of 19.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $97,809, a difference of 15.8%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,568 compared to $40,344, a difference of 2.0%), median earnings ($42,651 compared to $43,695, a difference of 2.5%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $48,836, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 61.4%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 49.9%), and single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%), male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and poverty (13.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 117.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 91.6%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 31.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.46%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.4%).