Osage vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,334,816 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 25.7 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $106,377, a difference of 20.3%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $108,499, a difference of 18.0%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $88,524, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.7%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $39,421, a difference of 9.4%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $47,851, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 41.2%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.8%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.0%).