Osage vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,083,367 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 20.9 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $29,031, a difference of 36.3%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $70,989, a difference of 29.5%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $59,159, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $42,380, a difference of 8.0%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $33,046, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $36,999, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 117.7%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 93.4%), and male poverty (12.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 81.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and single female poverty (24.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 91.1%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 84.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 82.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 60.6%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 39.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (63.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.67%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 39.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.73%), female disability (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.6%).