Osage vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,543,838 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 18.8 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 16.8%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $40,257, a difference of 11.7%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $83,289, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $53,457, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $90,372, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $59,837, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.6%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.5%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (63.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.0%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.37%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.4%).