Osage vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,152,787 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 40.5 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $103,682, a difference of 17.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $53,127, a difference of 16.1%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $106,144, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,802, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $61,104, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 46.6%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 41.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.6%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and single female poverty (24.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.4%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.2%), associate's degree (41.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.0%).