Osage vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,471,269 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $102,969, a difference of 16.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $52,654, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $86,073, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,306, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $46,433, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.3%).