Osage vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,989,415 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.156% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 156.2 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $102,779, a difference of 16.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $53,106, a difference of 16.0%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $87,262, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.0%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $54,279, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $46,645, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.1%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.64%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 6.2%).