Osage vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,864,575 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 25.6 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.2%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $42,581, a difference of 18.1%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $79,563, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $47,907, a difference of 4.7%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $33,894, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $79,358, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 46.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 35.1%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and single male poverty (16.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 117.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 69.3%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.4%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 59.4%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.30, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (63.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 56.2%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and female disability (14.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.7%).