Osage vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from England
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Immigrants from England

Fair
Good
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,183
SOCIAL INDEX
79.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
83rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from England Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,888,104 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Immigrants from England.
Osage Integration in Immigrants from England Communities

Osage vs Immigrants from England Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $109,446, a difference of 23.8%), per capita income ($39,568 compared to $48,844, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $92,098, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,817, a difference of 13.2%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $41,277, a difference of 14.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from England Income
Income MetricOsageImmigrants from England
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Exceptional
$48,844
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Exceptional
$112,038
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Exceptional
$92,098
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Exceptional
$49,722
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Exceptional
$59,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Exceptional
$41,277
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Fair
$51,817
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Exceptional
$102,020
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Exceptional
$109,446
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Exceptional
$65,715
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
27.9%

Osage vs Immigrants from England Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.0%).
Osage vs Immigrants from England Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageImmigrants from England
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
10.0%

Osage vs Immigrants from England Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Osage vs Immigrants from England Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageImmigrants from England
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%

Osage vs Immigrants from England Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from England Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageImmigrants from England
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
38.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Fair
82.6%

Osage vs Immigrants from England Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.95%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Osage vs Immigrants from England Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageImmigrants from England
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Good
31.1%

Osage vs Immigrants from England Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Osage vs Immigrants from England Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageImmigrants from England
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Exceptional
58.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.7%

Osage vs Immigrants from England Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.5%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).
Osage vs Immigrants from England Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageImmigrants from England
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
87.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
2.2%

Osage vs Immigrants from England Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 31.8%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Osage vs Immigrants from England Disability
Disability MetricOsageImmigrants from England
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.4%