Osage vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
Subsaharan African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
Sub-Saharan Africans
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Subsaharan African Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,929,587 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 38.9 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Osage vs Subsaharan African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 18.6%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,391, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $48,691, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $50,408, a difference of 0.23%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $84,235, a difference of 0.27%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $40,152, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Osage | Subsaharan African |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Tragic $40,152 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Tragic $93,748 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Tragic $77,631 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Tragic $44,118 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Tragic $50,408 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Tragic $38,391 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Tragic $48,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Tragic $84,235 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Tragic $90,691 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Tragic $56,615 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Osage vs Subsaharan African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 20.2%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 4.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Poverty Metric | Osage | Subsaharan African |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 20.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 20.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 23.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 31.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Osage vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Osage | Subsaharan African |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Osage vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | Subsaharan African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 38.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 75.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Poor 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 82.0% |
Osage vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.33%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Osage | Subsaharan African |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Tragic 41.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Tragic 36.7% |
Osage vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 40.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 27.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | Subsaharan African |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 87.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Tragic 51.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Osage vs Subsaharan African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | Osage | Subsaharan African |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Tragic 63.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 57.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 43.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Tragic 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Osage vs Subsaharan African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.8%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Disability Metric | Osage | Subsaharan African |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |