Osage vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,468,764 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.605% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 604.7 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $72,178, a difference of 17.0%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $44,204, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $34,317, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $43,266, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $51,393, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.48%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.6%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and high school diploma (89.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.34%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 70.9%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.1%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.6%).