Osage vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,115,081 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.744. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 47.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $106,849, a difference of 20.9%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $90,618, a difference of 20.4%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $110,011, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.9%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $56,302, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,259, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 40.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.68%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 40.5%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.4%).