Osage vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,952,549 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.923. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 26.1 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $52,465, a difference of 14.6%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $84,691, a difference of 12.6%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $44,318, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $59,090, a difference of 6.1%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $53,680, a difference of 6.7%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.70%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.0%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.0%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.7%).