Osage vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,949,761 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.150% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 150.1 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 18.6%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $40,644, a difference of 12.8%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $84,299, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $53,713, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $91,458, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $61,157, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 33.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.080%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.0%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.9%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.7%).