Osage vs Bermudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,390,805 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.990. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 14.1 Bermudans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.1%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $39,418, a difference of 9.4%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $42,911, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $47,359, a difference of 3.5%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $52,465, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $88,231, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.43%), male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.2%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.61%), family households (63.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 47.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.7%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.2%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.76%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.6%).