Osage vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,196,105 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 53.1 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $111,602, a difference of 26.3%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $93,971, a difference of 24.9%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $114,553, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $52,540, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $65,326, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 35.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 50.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 65.8%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.23%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 49.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.5%).