Osage vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,119,847 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.810. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.015% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 1,014.8 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $33,279, a difference of 18.9%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $80,908, a difference of 13.6%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $44,775, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $47,704, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $33,806, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $52,081, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.4%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 47.1%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.9%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and single female poverty (24.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 48.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 47.7%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 34.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.7%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (63.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and female disability (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.1%).