Osage vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Romanians

Fair
Excellent
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,011,118 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.315% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 315.2 Romanians.
Osage Integration in Romanian Communities

Osage vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $108,609, a difference of 22.9%), per capita income ($39,568 compared to $48,445, a difference of 22.4%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $91,994, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $64,142, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $41,663, a difference of 15.6%).
Osage vs Romanian Income
Income MetricOsageRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
28.0%

Osage vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.3%).
Osage vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%

Osage vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Osage vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Average
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Osage vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Osage vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Good
83.0%

Osage vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.6%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Osage vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Exceptional
28.7%

Osage vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.7%).
Osage vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.2%

Osage vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.8%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Osage vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
2.1%

Osage vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.7%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.8%).
Osage vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricOsageRomanian
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.4%