Osage vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,478,508 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 13.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,852, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $52,888, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,651 compared to $42,615, a difference of 0.090%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $91,763, a difference of 0.18%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $75,814, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.4%), female poverty (14.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and poverty (13.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.69%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.5%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 0.47%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.94%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.6%).