Osage vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,963,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.140% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 139.7 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $83,327, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,645, a difference of 10.7%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $52,908, a difference of 5.2%), per capita income ($39,568 compared to $42,289, a difference of 6.9%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $45,598, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.0%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.9%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.12%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.7%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.2%).