Osage vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,228,656 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Russians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $53,154, a difference of 34.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $116,328, a difference of 31.6%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $120,487, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $54,389, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $67,626, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Russian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 71.2%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 55.5%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.4%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.5%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 9.4%).