Osage vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,999,128 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 113.3 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $103,536, a difference of 17.1%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $106,183, a difference of 15.5%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $45,663, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $60,967, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,379, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 40.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.4%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.5%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 62.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.8%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.8%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.6%).