Osage vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,147,370 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 70.4 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.0%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $37,965, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $58,375, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,568 compared to $39,529, a difference of 0.10%), median earnings ($42,651 compared to $43,416, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $93,593, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.7%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.47%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.4%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.65%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.9%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.2%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.8%).