Osage vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,413,702 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 48.4 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $103,071, a difference of 16.6%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $85,681, a difference of 13.9%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $104,396, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $37,904, a difference of 5.2%), median earnings ($42,651 compared to $46,315, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $61,621, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.1%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.0%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.88%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.17%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.9%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.2%).