Osage vs Egyptian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Egyptians

Fair
Excellent
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Egyptian Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,282,943 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Egyptians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 104.0 Egyptians.
Osage Integration in Egyptian Communities

Osage vs Egyptian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $95,673, a difference of 27.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $112,256, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $105,282, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $65,441, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $54,444, a difference of 19.0%).
Osage vs Egyptian Income
Income MetricOsageEgyptian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Exceptional
$48,358
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Exceptional
$114,119
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Exceptional
$95,673
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Exceptional
$51,701
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Exceptional
$61,095
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Exceptional
$43,305
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Exceptional
$54,444
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Exceptional
$105,282
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Exceptional
$112,256
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Exceptional
$65,441
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Poor
26.6%

Osage vs Egyptian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 42.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.92%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.3%).
Osage vs Egyptian Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageEgyptian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
10.0%

Osage vs Egyptian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Osage vs Egyptian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageEgyptian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Osage vs Egyptian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Osage vs Egyptian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageEgyptian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.5%

Osage vs Egyptian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.83%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Osage vs Egyptian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageEgyptian
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
65.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Exceptional
28.2%

Osage vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 36.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.7%).
Osage vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageEgyptian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.1%

Osage vs Egyptian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.1%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Osage vs Egyptian Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageEgyptian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
63.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
17.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
2.2%

Osage vs Egyptian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.2%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 50.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.6%).
Osage vs Egyptian Disability
Disability MetricOsageEgyptian
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%