Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Immigrants from Ecuador

Fair
Poor
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,045,633 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.947. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.243% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 243.2 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Osage Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $53,722, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,644, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $50,474, a difference of 0.36%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $92,837, a difference of 0.99%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $54,030, a difference of 3.0%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricOsageImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
22.5%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 41.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 36.7%), and single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.28%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Tragic
15.0%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.2%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.4%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Tragic
33.7%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 174.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 83.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 69.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
4.2%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 75.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%

Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.5%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.43%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricOsageImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%