Osage vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,356,757 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.176% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 175.6 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $101,681, a difference of 35.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $118,426, a difference of 34.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $112,666, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.50%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $68,822, a difference of 23.6%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $44,586, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 47.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Asian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.28, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (63.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Asian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 48.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 46.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.25%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 68.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 54.4%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.2%).