Osage vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,718,578 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.843. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.104% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 2,104.5 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $54,610, a difference of 19.3%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $65,427, a difference of 17.5%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $86,498, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,568 compared to $39,826, a difference of 0.65%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $51,389, a difference of 2.2%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $44,206, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 41.3%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.3%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.1%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.42, a difference of 7.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.4%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.7%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and college, under 1 year (62.7% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.6%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.73%).