Osage vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,298,776 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.258% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 257.5 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $115,509, a difference of 53.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $134,910, a difference of 52.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $128,723, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $57,740, a difference of 26.2%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $49,508, a difference of 37.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 69.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 62.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.45%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 54.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 39.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 107.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 104.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 86.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 80.0%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 73.6%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%).