Osage vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,787,694 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 230.5 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $37,105, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $93,858, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $45,673, a difference of 0.20%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $55,356, a difference of 0.58%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $49,924, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.24%), female poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and poverty (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.0%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (41.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 8.8%), bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.0%), ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.4%).