Osage vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,404,422 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $89,100, a difference of 18.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $103,705, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $53,680, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.6%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $55,712, a difference of 10.8%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $47,617, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.8%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.080%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.18%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.95%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.7%).