Osage vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,697,724 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 33.8 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $34,886, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $84,451, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $54,668, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $34,895, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $80,260, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 64.4%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 55.7%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.6%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and single female poverty (24.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 72.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 67.8%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 24.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.0%), family households (63.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.0%), bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Apache communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.14%).