Osage vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,536,683 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $71,021, a difference of 27.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $55,158, a difference of 20.5%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $89,919, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,568 compared to $41,017, a difference of 3.7%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $52,306, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $45,027, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 36.9%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.1%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.43, a difference of 7.9%), and family households (63.7% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.85%), currently married (47.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.8%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.9%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and associate's degree (41.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.3%).