Osage vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,722,714 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.272% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 272.2 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $106,057, a difference of 41.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $124,188, a difference of 40.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $116,626, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $70,103, a difference of 25.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $57,818, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 52.5%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 50.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.72%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 29.9%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.090%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 64.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 59.5%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 77.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 63.5%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 8.3%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.9%).