Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Vietnam
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Immigrants from Vietnam

Fair
Good
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,880
SOCIAL INDEX
66.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
138th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Vietnam Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,645,162 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 80.0 Immigrants from Vietnam.
Osage Integration in Immigrants from Vietnam Communities

Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $91,987, a difference of 22.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $55,562, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $106,417, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.2%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $54,913, a difference of 9.2%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $43,229, a difference of 9.2%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Income
Income MetricOsageImmigrants from Vietnam
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Fair
$43,229
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Excellent
$106,186
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Exceptional
$91,987
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Good
$47,282
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Good
$54,913
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Good
$40,153
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Exceptional
$55,562
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Exceptional
$100,535
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Exceptional
$106,417
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Excellent
$63,014
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Good
25.2%

Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 37.3%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.1%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageImmigrants from Vietnam
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Excellent
11.0%

Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageImmigrants from Vietnam
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageImmigrants from Vietnam
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Excellent
83.1%

Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.9%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households (63.7% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.64%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageImmigrants from Vietnam
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.38
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Exceptional
29.3%

Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageImmigrants from Vietnam
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Exceptional
60.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
23.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 89.7%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageImmigrants from Vietnam
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
88.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
83.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Poor
64.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Poor
58.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Poor
14.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.0%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Vietnam Disability
Disability MetricOsageImmigrants from Vietnam
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%