Osage vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,814,608 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.850. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.401% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 401.4 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 40.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $52,437, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $40,895, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $55,598, a difference of 0.14%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $51,376, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $93,988, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 38.3%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 34.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 183.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 89.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 19.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 46.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.6%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 61.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.6%).