Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Guatemala
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Immigrants from Guatemala

Fair
Poor
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,724,756 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.268% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 268.2 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Osage Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities

Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,447, a difference of 12.4%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $46,244, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,240 compared to $75,123, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $35,444, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $86,573, a difference of 2.1%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
Income MetricOsageImmigrants from Guatemala
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Tragic
$37,550
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Tragic
$87,191
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Tragic
$75,123
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Tragic
$40,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Tragic
$46,244
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Tragic
$35,444
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Poor
$51,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Tragic
$81,341
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Tragic
$86,573
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Tragic
$53,950
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
22.5%

Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (24.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageImmigrants from Guatemala
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
16.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
24.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Tragic
14.6%

Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.6%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageImmigrants from Guatemala
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Good
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
8.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.4%

Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.64%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageImmigrants from Guatemala
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.1%

Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.41, a difference of 7.3%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageImmigrants from Guatemala
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Tragic
37.5%

Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.8%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageImmigrants from Guatemala
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 103.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and college, under 1 year (62.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageImmigrants from Guatemala
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
93.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
91.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
90.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
89.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
87.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Tragic
85.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
84.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
81.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
77.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
56.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
38.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Tragic
30.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%

Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.2%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.080%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
Disability MetricOsageImmigrants from Guatemala
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
49.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%