Osage vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,401,334 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.904. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.008% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 1,007.7 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $112,175, a difference of 26.9%), per capita income ($39,568 compared to $49,893, a difference of 26.1%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $94,091, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $52,638, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $41,771, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.2%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.0%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 38.3%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.9%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 10.4%).